free prenuptial agreement template

Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreement

Oklahoma prenuptial agreements are governed by Oklahoma Statutes Title 15, § 136 and enforced under the three-part Burgess test: a prenup holds if it made fair provision for the challenging spouse, or there was full financial disclosure, or the challenger had generally accurate knowledge of the other's finances — only one of the three is required. Courts apply dual review, assessed at both signing and divorce. The alimony floor is public assistance eligibility, and uniquely, courts may only order enough support to avoid that threshold — they cannot require significantly more.

Bottom line: Oklahoma earns a C+ grade. Dual review is a meaningful weakness, but the flexible Burgess disclosure standard, a capped alimony floor, and a high fraud burden make Oklahoma more enforceable in practice than its dual-review peers.

Oklahoma Prenup Enforceability Rating: C+

Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreement Template & Forms

Oklahoma Prenuptial AgreementWord | PDF

Exhibit A: Party A Asset Disclosure Schedule (wife) Word

Exhibit B: Party B Asset Disclosure Schedule (husband) Word

Asset Update and Reaffirmation Word | PDF

Oklahoma Prenup Laws: Key Statutes Explained

Oklahoma Statutes Title 15, Section 136

Separate Property 

All assets can remain separate property, avoiding costly divorce settlements. Joint assets and debts titled in both names are split 50/50 as marital property.  

Unconscionability Dual Review

Oklahoma reviews prenuptial agreements for unconscionability both at execution (signing) AND at enforcement (divorce), meaning courts can reject or modify agreements if circumstances change during marriage. This incentivizes divorce and litigation.

Unconscionability Standard—The Burgess Test 

A prenup is unenforceable if the challenging party proves: (1) involuntary execution due to fraud, duress, or coercion; OR (2) failure of the "Burgess Test"—which requires either (a) fair and reasonable provision for the challenging spouse, (b) full, fair, and frank financial disclosure, OR (c) generally accurate knowledge of the other's worth.

Spousal Support Public Assistance Minimum 

Courts may override spousal support waivers if enforcement would make one party eligible for public assistance at separation or divorce. However, courts can only require support "to the extent necessary to avoid that eligibility"—they cannot easily require significantly more than public assistance.

Timing

No minimum specified, but we recommend signing the prenup 60+ days before the wedding, with both parties having 2-3 weeks to review the final version to minimize challenge risk.  Reach out to an attorney at least 4-6 months before the wedding with your draft prenup.  Better yet, sign the prenup before proposing.

Independent Counsel 

Not required, but separate counsel dramatically strengthens enforceability if the agreement is later challenged.

Financial Disclosure

"Full, fair, and frank" disclosure of all assets, debts, income, and financial interests required. Disclose all assets $1,000+ and income. However, if the challenging party had "generally accurate knowledge" of the other's worth, courts may still enforce the agreement despite disclosure imperfections (Griffin v. Griffin upheld prenup with significant asset valuation discrepancies).

High Burden to Challenge 

Challenging party must prove fraud or misrepresentation by clear and convincing evidence (higher standard than “preponderance” threshold). Oklahoma courts are "pro-prenup" and call fraud "extremely hard to prove" and "exceedingly rare." 

Child Support and Custody 

Child support and custody clauses are unenforceable and could undermine the entire agreement. Do not include.

Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreement Court Cases

Taylor v. Taylor, 832 P.2d 429 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991) 

The court upheld the prenuptial agreement's provisions denying wife alimony and division of husband's separate property, but reversed the trial court's refusal to award wife a share of the increased value of the marital estate attributable to the joint efforts of the parties during the ten-year marriage.

In re Marriage of Neundorf, 131 P.3d 142 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006) 

The court upheld the trial court's award of alimony in lieu of property division to wife where she had contributed substantial separate funds ($194,000, $50,850, and $97,500) to purchase three farms during the marriage that husband claimed as his separate property under the prenuptial agreement.

Francis v. Francis, 285 P.3d 707 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012) 

The court partially affirmed and partially reversed the trial court's interpretation of a prenuptial agreement provision requiring husband to be responsible for wife's "care" upon her disability, ultimately reducing the support award from the trial court's $4,225 per month based on the proper construction of the agreement's terms.

Griffin v. Griffin, 94 P.3d 96 (Okla. Civ. App. 2004) 

The court reversed the trial court and upheld the prenuptial agreement where husband had disclosed assets valued at $2.5 million on an income tax basis (actual fair market value was estimated at $12-29 million for certain assets), finding wife had generally accurate knowledge of husband's wealth after dating over a year and knowing about his family's television stations and food business, despite her claims of fraud and inadequate financial disclosure.

Matter of Estate of Burgess, 646 P.2d 623 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982) 

The court upheld the prenuptial agreement despite the lack of specific fair provisions for wife and disparity in wealth between the spouses, establishing the three-part "Burgess Test" still used today: (1) was fair provision made for the challenging spouse, (2) if not, was there full financial disclosure, or (3) if not, did the challenging spouse have generally accurate knowledge of the other's worth.

Metcalf v. Metcalf, 465 P.3d 1187 (Okla. 2020) 

While this Oklahoma Supreme Court case primarily addressed interspousal property transfers and the presumption of gifts (holding that the presumption cannot be rebutted with evidence that the transfer was made to defraud creditors), it also affirmed the trial court's denial of support alimony to wife and provides important context on factors Oklahoma courts consider in alimony determinations that prenuptial agreements can waive or modify.

5-Step Checklist: How to Sign & Execute a Prenup in Oklahoma

Step 1: Download and read the Oklahoma prenuptial agreement

Start with our free template. It is written for Oklahoma-specific statutes and case law under Oklahoma Statutes Title 15, Section 136 and the Burgess test governing enforceability. Read it in full — know what you are getting into legally with marriage. The 15+ pages is written thoroughly to include rebuttals to common legal challenges and fallback provisions.

Step 2: Draft changes on your own

See a clause you don't like? Copy it into an AI like Claude, explain what you'd like to change or what you want the clause "to do." Save any changes as a separate alternate version — don't overwrite the original. Bring both versions to your attorney review. Note: AI is often gender-biased and crafts terms beyond what is legally required. Push back on its output.

Step 3: Find a lawyer in your state

Find a matrimonial or divorce attorney in your state. Avvo, Findlaw, and Justia are good. Look for someone with 10+ years experience. Call or email and ask them how much to review your draft prenup and help with signing. Send them your draft.

Step 4: Meet your lawyer 4–6 months before the wedding

Our recommendation: sign the prenup before proposing. That way, you both get the legal work out of the way, and you know this is the right person to marry. Already proposed? 4–6 months before the wedding should leave you enough time to give your spouse 1–2 weeks to review the final draft and have it signed 60+ days before the wedding. Oklahoma has no statutory minimum, but last-minute presentation is one of the primary grounds for a duress challenge — and Oklahoma courts require fraud to be proven by clear and convincing evidence, so avoiding any appearance of pressure matters.

Step 5: Sign, notarize, and store the agreement

Execute the agreement with both attorneys present — their witness signatures carry more enforceability weight than a standalone notary. Oklahoma law requires only a writing signed by both parties (Okla. Stat. tit. 15 § 136) — no witnesses or notarization are mandated by statute. That said, notarization authenticates signatures and deters fraud claims, and attorney witness signatures provide the clearest evidence of voluntariness if the agreement is later challenged. Each party keeps a signed original, and so should each party's attorney. Store yours somewhere secure like a safety deposit box. Create a .pdf and save it via a backup drive and email.

Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreement: Frequently Asked Questions (2026)

What is a prenuptial agreement?

A legal contract signed before marriage that determines how assets, debts, and finances are handled if the marriage ends. We recommend assets and debts are kept separate, unless held jointly, where they are split 50/50. Alimony is modified to incentivize larger families and longer marriages, rather than divorce. A privacy clause allows the growth of an intimate, trusting relationship. A dispute resolution clause moves proceedings out of an expensive courtroom and into mediation or arbitration, lowering conflict to maintain a workable relationship in the event of divorce.

How much does a prenup cost in Oklahoma?

Attorney-drafted from scratch: $1,500–$5,000+ per side. The smarter approach: start with our free Oklahoma template, draft any changes with an AI like Claude, then hire an attorney only to review and assist with signing. The bill should be around $500 per side.

Are prenups enforceable in Oklahoma?

Yes, but Oklahoma earns a C rating. Courts are described as "pro-prenup" and fraud is "exceedingly rare" to prove (Griffin), but spousal support provisions face dual review at divorce, and the Burgess test's structure creates some enforcement unpredictability. Additionally, Oklahoma courts will not allow a prenup to bar equitable division of property that was jointly built during the marriage (Taylor) — separate premarital property is protected, but marital effort during the marriage may produce marital rights regardless of prenup language. A prenup is still far better than none.

What makes a prenup invalid in Oklahoma?

Any one of three grounds is sufficient: (1) involuntary execution — fraud, duress, or coercion (proven by clear and convincing evidence); (2) failure of all three Burgess factors simultaneously — meaning no fair provision AND no full disclosure AND no general knowledge of the other's worth; or (3) terms that promote or encourage divorce. The Burgess test works in favor of enforcement — satisfying any one of its three alternatives is enough to uphold the agreement, which is why Griffin enforced a prenup where disclosed asset values were vastly understated, because the wife had general knowledge of the husband's wealth. Leave child custody and support out entirely.

Do I need a lawyer to get a prenup in Oklahoma?

Not technically, but independent counsel for both sides is the strongest protection against a voluntariness challenge, and courts consider the opportunity to consult counsel when evaluating whether execution was free. Oklahoma also specifically notes that fraud is "exceedingly hard to prove" — so the main risk is disclosure and voluntariness, both of which are substantially mitigated by having attorneys. Use the template to cut drafting costs — don't skip the attorney.

What should an Oklahoma prenuptial agreement include?

Our Oklahoma template is built around six core principles:

  • Separate property — assets and debts stay with the party who acquired them, minimizing conflict
  • Joint assets and debts — anything both parties sign for together is split 50/50
  • Marital home — ownership is tracked as a percentage of contribution, so each party gets back what they put in
  • Spousal support — structured to incentivize larger families and longer marriages, not divorce
  • Full financial disclosure — all assets, debts, and income over $1,000, listed in the exhibits, satisfying the Burgess "full, fair, and frank" disclosure standard
  • Privacy clause — keeps financial and personal details private, supporting a trusting relationship

Leave out child custody and support entirely — Oklahoma courts will not enforce them and they can invalidate the rest of the agreement.

Does Oklahoma's property law make a prenup important?

Yes. Oklahoma is an equitable distribution state under Okla. Stat. tit. 43 § 121 — courts divide marital property based on what they consider fair, not automatically 50/50. A prenup overrides this. One critical Oklahoma nuance: a prenup can protect your separate premarital property, but courts have held it cannot bar equitable division of property that was jointly acquired through the efforts of both spouses during the marriage (Taylor, Griffin).

How far in advance should I get a prenup in Oklahoma?

Sign 60+ days before the wedding. Give your spouse at least two weeks to review with their own attorney. Oklahoma has no statutory minimum, but close-to-wedding signing invites duress claims. Contact an attorney 4–6 months before the wedding. Best practice: sign before proposing — no time pressure, and you'll be confident in whom you are choosing to marry.

What is the Burgess test and how does it work?

Matter of Estate of Burgess, 646 P.2d 623 (1982) established the three-part test Oklahoma courts apply to determine whether a prenup is enforceable. It works in the disjunctive — satisfying any one of the three alternatives is sufficient to uphold the agreement: (1) the prenup makes fair and reasonable provision for the challenging spouse; OR (2) there was full, fair, and frank financial disclosure before signing; OR (3) the challenging spouse had generally accurate knowledge of the other's worth. In Griffin, asset values disclosed at $2.5 million (actual value $12–29 million) were still sufficient because the wife knew generally how wealthy the husband was from their relationship. The practical takeaway: thorough financial disclosure is your strongest protection, and it doesn't require perfection — substantial accuracy satisfies the test.